USPTO serial 73446030
ONESHOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONESHOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
QUEENSLAND, 4154, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD NATTER
HOWARD NATTER NATTER & NATTER25 W 43RD STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | INKS, NAMELY, STENCIL INKS, AND INK CARTRIDGES, FOR USE WITH ROLLER AND BRUSH INKING SYSTEMS. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 17, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |