USPTO serial 73446729
SOLLICH-ENROMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 1985
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOLLICH-ENROMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BAD SALZUFLEN, DE
BAD SALZUFLEN, DE
BAD SALZUFLEN, DE
BAD SALZUFLEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M. Thomas
GEORGE M THOMAS THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CHOCOLATE COATING MACHINES FOR CONFECTIONARY AND BAKED PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLLICH GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SOLLICH KG
- Other trademarks owned by SOLLICH GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SOLLICH GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SOLLICH-ENROMAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |