USPTO serial 73446902
LA LINGERIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA LINGERIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SIEGEL
JAMES E SIEGEL LACKENBACH SIEGEL MARZULLO PRESTA &ARONSON, PENTHOUSE STE ONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 24, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |