USPTO serial 73447343
ROTHSCHILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROTHSCHILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN KORN
MARTIN KORN RICHARDS, HARRIS, MEDLOCK & ANDREWS4500 RENAISSANCE TWR1201 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270-2197Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COLOGNE FOR MEN | ABANDONED | Feb 16, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1988 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |