USPTO serial 73448183
MCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS V. SMURZYNSKI
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHOTOTYPESETTER WORK STATION - NAMELY, PHOTOTYPESETTER, FILM PROCESSOR, COMPUTERIZED CONTROLLER, KEYBOARD, SCREENS, AND PRINTER. | ABANDONED | May 15, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 6, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |