USPTO serial 73448372
IZZY'S FAMOUS CORNED BEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 1994
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IZZY'S FAMOUS CORNED BEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CINCINNATI, OH
CINCINNATI, OH
CINCINNATI, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANCIS T. KREMBLAS, JR.
FRANCIS T KREMBLAS JR KREMBLAS, FOSTER & WATKINS50 W BROAD STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 1993 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 1993 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 1993 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |