Drawing for FILET GOURMET

USPTO serial 73450307

FILET GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILET GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

OLIVER EDWARDS

OLIVER EDWARDS HAIGHT, GARDNER, POOR & HAVENSONE STATE ST PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FROZEN, BREADED, BATTER FRIED, BATTERED, RAW AND PRECOOKED FISH STICKS, PORTIONS AND FILLETS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FISH OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIES: COD,HADDOCK, POLLOCK, WHITING, GREAT SILVER SMELT AND OCEAN CATFISHABANDONEDSep 15, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 1985ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1984ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 7, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance