USPTO serial 73451127
WELDMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WELDMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S.I.P. (INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS) LIMITED
LOUGHBOROUGH, LEICESTERSHIRE, GB
Other trademarks owned by S.I.P. (INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS) LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW V. GALWAY
ANDREW V GALWAY LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & VACCARO80 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A PORTABLE ARC WELDING KIT CONTAINING A TRANSFORMER, AN ELECTRODE HOLDER, EARTH CLAMP, ELECTRODES, HAMMER, BRUSH, FACE MASK AND INSTRUCTION BOOKLET | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 1985 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 26, 1985 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1981 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |