Drawing for TOASTMASTER BASIC BURNER

USPTO serial 73451278

TOASTMASTER BASIC BURNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOASTMASTER BASIC BURNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM B. KIRCHER

WILLIAM B KIRCHER KOKJER, KIRCHER, BRADLEY, WHARTONBOWMAN & JOHNSON2414 COMMERCE TWR 911 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2074

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ELECTRIC BUFFET RANGES FOR DOMESTIC USEABANDONEDOct 12, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 2, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 2, 1986EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 27, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 25, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance