USPTO serial 73452065
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMON KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND C. STEWART
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 208THFALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | EQUIPMENT AND BOOKS SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |