USPTO serial 73452088
CONTOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1374376Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 1985
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. WARREN WHITESEL
LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHAIGA AVECHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | BACK MASSAGERS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1988 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1988 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 1986 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |