USPTO serial 73452376
FRESH FRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESH FRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SPRINGDALE, AZ
PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SPRINGDALE, AZ
PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SPRINGDALE, AZ
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. BAYNHAM
ROBERT J BAYNHAM SEED AND BERRY1001 BANK OF CALIFORNIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98164UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | CUSTOMER ATTENDED FOOD FRYERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by UI GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named FRESH FRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1994 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 18, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 30, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 31, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |