USPTO serial 73452542
CADEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CADEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING CORP.
UPPER SADDLE RIVER, NJ
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING CORP.
UPPER SADDLE RIVER, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD H. KRUMHOLZ
ARNOLD H KRUMHOLZ LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG ET AL600 S AVEWEST WESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL PURPOSE AND MICROWAVE CIRCUITS TO BE ANALYZED AND OPTIMIZED | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |