USPTO serial 73453280
MALIBU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABATE CANDICE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MALIBU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLSWORTH R. ROSTON
ELLSWORTH R ROSTON ROSTON & SCHWARTZ5900 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WHIRLPOOL BATHS AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS FOR SUCH BATHS, SUCH SYSTEMS COMPRISING JET NOZZLES, PIPING, FITTINGS AND PUMPS FOR HYDROTHERAPY AND RELAXATION | ABANDONED | Jan 4, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 1985 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 15, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |