USPTO serial 73453988
TERRA-WALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1634823Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 1991
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TERRA-WALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RICMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
GORMLEY, ONTARIO, CA
RICMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
RICMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WELDON F. GREEN
WELDON F GREEN141 ADELAIDE ST WSTE 402TORONTO, ON M5H 3L5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | PRECAST HOLLOW INTERLOCKING MODULES; MODULES FOR USE IN LANDSCAPING, RETAINING WALLS AND FREE STANDING STRUCTURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by RISI STONE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHBURY INVESTMENTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named TERRA-WALL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 1988 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |