USPTO serial 73455853
SIDEWINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SIDEWINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAFAYETTE, LA, US
LAFAYETTE, LA, US
LAFAYETTE, LA, US
LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA, LA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia M. FitzPatrick
Julia M. FitzPatrick Garvey, Smith & Nehrbass, Patent Attorneys, L.L.C.701 Poydras St., Suite 4310New Orleans, LA 70139United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMPS USED NAMELY TO INJECT METERED AMOUNTS OF CHEMICALS, CORROSION AND SCALE INHIBITORS INTO WELL HEADS, FLOW LINES, LEASE PRODUCTION FACILITIES, AND REFINERY PROCESSES, AND FOR THE INJECTION OF METHANOL TO PREVENT GAS LINE FREEZING | ACTIVE | Nov 4, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE, ALBERT L.
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE, ALBERT L.
- Other trademarks owned by SIDEWINDER PUMPS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE, ALBERT L.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SIDEWINDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 12, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 4, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 9, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |