USPTO serial 73455966
Serial No. 73455966
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 73455966?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen R. Smith
Maureen R. Smith Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Pipe Couplings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 24, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |