USPTO serial 73456194
GRAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1914751Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 1995
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE A. LOUD
GEORGE A LOUD LORUSSO & LOUD3137 MT VERNON AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | NOZZLES, BEING PARTS OF FURNACES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 5, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |