USPTO serial 73458329
PRO-FILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO-FILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BAY SHORE, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD H. LOVEMAN
EDWARD H LOVEMAN150 BROAD HOLLOW RD STE 118MELVILLE, NY 11747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS ON DISKETTES CONTAINING PATIENT FILES AND TEST REPORTING SOFT WARE USED IN COMPUTERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH BODY REHABILITATION APPARATUS, AND FITNESS AND TRAINING MACHINES | ABANDONED | Dec 9, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 12, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 26, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |