Drawing for KRIS KRINGLE FIR

USPTO serial 73458957

KRIS KRINGLE FIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHN, DEBBIE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRIS KRINGLE FIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS H. MURRAY

THOMAS H MURRAY2230 KOPPERS BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028ARTIFICIAL CHRISTMAS TREE, WREATHS, AND CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS AND ORNAMENTSABANDONEDFeb 25, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 5, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 23, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 26, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 25, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance