USPTO serial 73459143
KIWI NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIWI NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD D. JEFFERY
DONALD D JEFFERY SCHWARTZ JEFFERY SCHWAAB MACK BLUMENTHAL& KOCH, P O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | SHELTERING NETS IN THE FORM OF WIND BARRIERS FOR THE PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |