USPTO serial 73459430
L M S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L M S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD E. MEIER
GARDERE & WYNNE1500 DIAMOND SHAMROCK TWR75201DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | LETTER SHOP MAILING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |