Drawing for VEGETABLE SVELTES

USPTO serial 73459582

VEGETABLE SVELTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGETABLE SVELTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. WAYNE WESTERN

THORPE N & WESTERN9662 S STATE ST84070SANDY, UT 84070

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030WHEAT CRACKERS SOLD THROUGH FRANCHISED OUTLETS OFFERING WEIGHT REDUCTION SERVICESABANDONEDAug 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 23, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 14, 1986UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 14, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance