Drawing for HIGH-TECH MARKETING

USPTO serial 73459798

HIGH-TECH MARKETING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGH-TECH MARKETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK J. WALSH

PATRICK J WALSH2713 CONGRESS ST06430FAIRFIELD, CT 06430

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016A MAGAZINE FOR INFORMATION, OPINIONS, NEWS, DATA, ANALYSIS, TECHNIQUES, CASE HISTORIES, AND SO FORTH, RELATING TO THE MARKETING OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS, AND BIOTECHNOLOGYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 11, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 11, 1987EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 14, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance