USPTO serial 73459798
HIGH-TECH MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH-TECH MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J. WALSH
PATRICK J WALSH2713 CONGRESS ST06430FAIRFIELD, CT 06430Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | A MAGAZINE FOR INFORMATION, OPINIONS, NEWS, DATA, ANALYSIS, TECHNIQUES, CASE HISTORIES, AND SO FORTH, RELATING TO THE MARKETING OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 11, 1987 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 14, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |