Drawing for INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST

USPTO serial 73460062

INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1486583Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 26, 1988
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE M. JARVIS

LAWRENCE M JARVIS MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTDSTE 3400500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036UNDERWRITING AND DISTRIBUTION OF A TAX-EXEMPT INVESTMENT FUND CONSISTING OF SECURITIES IN THE NATURE OF MUNICIPAL OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL OBLIGATIONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 19, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 24, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 17, 19948.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Oct 14, 1994PR15POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15—
Apr 25, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 26, 1988R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 24, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 1988EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Mar 10, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 9, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance