USPTO serial 73460062
INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 1988
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE M. JARVIS
LAWRENCE M JARVIS MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTDSTE 3400500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | UNDERWRITING AND DISTRIBUTION OF A TAX-EXEMPT INVESTMENT FUND CONSISTING OF SECURITIES IN THE NATURE OF MUNICIPAL OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL OBLIGATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INSURED MUNICIPALS INCOME TRUST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 14, 1994 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 24, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 1988 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 10, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |