USPTO serial 73460430
CLIMAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLIMAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS I. ROZSA
TILLES & WEBB6320 COMMODORE SLOAT DR90048LOS ANGELES, CA 90048Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | ELECTRICIANS TAPE, DUCT TAPE, THREAD SEAL TAPE AND PIPE WRAP TAPE | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1987 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |