USPTO serial 73460555
DELUXE SALON STYLING CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 1985
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DELUXE SALON STYLING CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY SHUR
LEBLANC, NOLAN, SHUR & NIES1911 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY222023572ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3572Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HAIR STYLING SET COMPRISING - HAIR CURLING IRON WITH BRUSH ATTACHMENT AND HAND-HELD ELECTRIC HAIRDRYERS, SOLD AS A UNIT . | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 12, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |