USPTO serial 73460976
MAKE DOOR HANGING EASY WITH THE WORLD'S EASIEST-TO-INSTALL AMERICAN MADE HINGE THE NO-MORTISE FASTINGE HINGE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKE DOOR HANGING EASY WITH THE WORLD'S EASIEST-TO-INSTALL AMERICAN MADE HINGE THE NO-MORTISE FASTINGE HINGE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MYRON AMER
BAUER & AMER LEVER BLDG 114 OLD COUNTRY RDSTE 344115014477MINEOLA, NY 11501-4477Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | HINGES | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 6, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |