Drawing for INNOVATIONS

USPTO serial 73461180

INNOVATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DON B. FINKELSTEIN

DON B FINKELSTEINSTE 1218700 S FLOWER STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025LADIES' GARMENTS NAMELY, LADIES' JACKETS, LADIES' VESTS, LADIES' PANTS AND LADIES' SHORTSABANDONEDDec 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 29, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 15, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 16, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 1987REINREINSTATED—
Feb 1, 1985ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance