Drawing for WHEAT CURLS

USPTO serial 73461197

WHEAT CURLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEAT CURLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MORGAN L. FITCH, JR.

FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY135 S LASALLE ST60603CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030WHEAT BASE SNACK FOODABANDONEDJul 29, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 1986ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 16, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance