USPTO serial 73461362
VICTORIA - SPRINGS - SPARKLING NATURAL MINERAL WATER 9.5 FL OZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 1988
- Examiner
- MARKS, MARTIN H.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VICTORIA - SPRINGS - SPARKLING NATURAL MINERAL WATER 9.5 FL OZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEECHAM (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
MOORABBIN, VICTORIA, AU
PRESTON, VICTORIA, AU
PRESTON, VICTORIA, AU
PRESTON, VICTORIA, AU
NORTH FITZROY, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAY - 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NATURAL AND FLAVORED MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEECHAM (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BASMEC NOMINEES PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BASMEC NOMINEES PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BASMEC NOMINEES PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BASMEC NOMINEES PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named VICTORIA - SPRINGS - SPARKLING NATURAL MINERAL WATER 9.5 FL OZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1985 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |