USPTO serial 73461373
B.I.G. LEAGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B.I.G. LEAGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD E. MCGLYNN, JR., P.C.
1650 W. BIG BEAVER ROAD SUITE 210TROY, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | BASEBALLS, SOFTBALLS AND BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL GLOVES | ABANDONED | Dec 12, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 28, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |