USPTO serial 73462975
SOFTWARE DIGEST RATINGS NEWSLETTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1421855Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 1986
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOFTWARE DIGEST RATINGS NEWSLETTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR H. SEIDEL
ARTHUR H SEIDEL SEIDEL, GONDA, GOLDHAMMER & ABBOTT1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PERIODICALS REPORTS DIRECTED TO SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 11, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL SOFTWARE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTWARE DIGEST, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL SOFTWARE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SOFTWARE DIGEST RATINGS NEWSLETTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1993 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 29, 1988 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| May 16, 1988 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1988 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |