USPTO serial 73463052
MEGABIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEGABIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C. BAKER
PETERSON, PALMATIER, STRUM SJOQUIST & BAKER, LTD940 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CTR7900 XERXES AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55431Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DATA CHANNEL DISTANCE EXTENSION UNITS CONSISTING OF PASSIVE ELEMENTS FOR PROVIDING A SIMPLE EXTENSION CORD FUNCTION BETWEEN COMPUTERS AND PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | Sep 20, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |