USPTO serial 73463080
GRIFFIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIFFIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRED P. KOSTKA
AMSTED INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED3700 PRUDENTIAL PLZ60601CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | CAST IRON PIPE, DUCTILE IRON PIPE | ABANDONED | Apr 8, 1960 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1987 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 16, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |