USPTO serial 73463439
PREP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY ANN ALFORD
MARY ANN ALFORD LOCATION E2250UNION CARBIDE CORPORATIONOLD RIDGEBURY RD, CT 06817Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS APPLIED TO COTTON PLANTS | ABANDONED | Jun 24, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |