Drawing for V G VIDEO GUIDE

USPTO serial 73463495

V G VIDEO GUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V G VIDEO GUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. E. WALLIN

LINDA M BYRNE MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL1000 NORWEST CTR55 E FIFTH STSAINT PAUL, MN 55101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES FOROTHERSABANDONEDOct 21, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1985ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 31, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance