Drawing for SURAX

USPTO serial 73463589

SURAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1357457Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 3, 1985
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAROLD J. KINNEY

KINNEY & LANGE, PA 625 FOURTH AVE SSTE 1500554151659MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1659

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001SURFACTANTS FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF ALL PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, SHAMPOOS, SOAPS, DETERGENTS, CLEANING EMULSIONS AND CLEANING SOLUTIONSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 11, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 1992C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 24, 1992CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 1992CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 1990PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 3, 1985R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 25, 1985PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance