USPTO serial 73464316
ITS 8300
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1483113Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 1988
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ITS 8300?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY M. ROPSKI
GARY M ROPSKI WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA COMMUNICATIONS TERMINALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTEL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BRITISH TELECOM (C.B.P.) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTEL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ITS 8300
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1994 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 1990 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |