Drawing for STEPHEN MARKS

USPTO serial 73464631

STEPHEN MARKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEPHEN MARKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN B. POKOTILOW

BLUM KAPLAN FRIEDMAN SILBERMAN & BERAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICAS18TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, DRESSES, COATS, SUITS, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, TROUSERS, JACKETS, BLOUSES, WAISTCOATS, BELTS, HATS, SWEATERS, SCARVES AND SOCKSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 22, 1985ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 4, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance