USPTO serial 73465816
SLEEPY HOLLOW BOTANICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 1988
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SLEEPY HOLLOW BOTANICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORP.
LAS VEGAS, NV
LARKSPUR, CA
NOVATO, CA
LARKSPUR, CA
LARKSPUR, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
Joseph T. Nabor Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR AND SKIN CONDITIONER, SKIN CLEANSER, FACIAL AND BODY SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAMS AND LOTIONS, SUNTAN OILS AND LOTIONS, AND SUNSCREEN LOTIONS | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by SLEEPY HOLLOW NATURALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARME, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SLEEPY HOLLOW NATURALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SLEEPY HOLLOW NATURALS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SLEEPY HOLLOW BOTANICALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 7, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |