USPTO serial 73466400
DATAWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1520585Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATAWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES P. DUGAN
DATAWORKS CORPORATION5910 PACIFIC CENTER BLVD.SAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 10, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |