Drawing for BEHAVIORAL MEDICAL CARE

USPTO serial 73466956

BEHAVIORAL MEDICAL CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEHAVIORAL MEDICAL CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM B. BUNKER

WILLIAM B BUNKER KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING MEDICAL CARE RELATING TO STRESS AND MENTAL ILLNESS, CHEMICAL DEPENDENCIES, EATING DISORDERS AND REHABILITATIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY.ACTIVEAug 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 18, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 14, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance