USPTO serial 73467073
CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELDON BURSHTEIN
BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDONP O BOX 25COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1A9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FURNITURE, NAMELY, LIVING ROOM FURNITURE, DINING ROOM FURNITURE AND RECREATION ROOM FURNITURE | ABANDONED | Oct 21, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1987 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |