USPTO serial 73468327
CRYSTAL MIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 1986
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYSTAL MIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALISTOGA, CA
CALISTOGA, CA
VERNON, CA
CALISTOGA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL A. LIMBACH
NEIL A SMITH OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FACIAL REFRESHING AND MOISTURIZING SPRAY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 21, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRYSTAL GEYSER WATER COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CRYSTAL GEYSER WATER COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by PARASOL CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CRYSTAL GEYSER WATER COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CRYSTAL MIST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 12, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |