Drawing for PROJECT MANAGER WORKBENCH

USPTO serial 73468381

PROJECT MANAGER WORKBENCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROJECT MANAGER WORKBENCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN K. ARMSTRONG

JOHN K ARMSTRONG C/O COLE & DEITZ40 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FORM OF COMPUTER PROGRAM MATERIALS PRERECORDED AND MAGNETICALLY OR OTHERWISE STORED IN DISKS,DISKETTS, TAPES OR ANY OTHER RECORDING MEDIA TOGETHER WITH THE USER'S MANUALS AND GUIDES THEREFOR, WHICH ARE SOLD TOGETHERABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 1985PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 5, 1985PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 22, 1985ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance