USPTO serial 73468445
THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1477222Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 16, 1988
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER W. PARKHURST
David H. Deits Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES TO BUSINESSES, NAMELY, RECRUITMENT AND REPLACEMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADVISING AND CONSULTING IN RELATION TO PERSONNEL PLACEMENT PROGRESS REVIEWS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 2, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 16, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 1987 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 15, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |