USPTO serial 73469649
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SEATRONICS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
SEATRONICS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
SEATRONICS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RON RICHES
RON RICHES COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESBOX 12109555 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY COMPUTER PROCESSORS, COMPUTER TERMINALS, COMPUTER MONITORS, COMPUTER DIGITIZERS, COMPUTER DISC DRIVES; COMPUTER PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 16, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 29, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |