Drawing for MERIDIAN NATIONAL BANK

USPTO serial 73469867

MERIDIAN NATIONAL BANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERIDIAN NATIONAL BANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN F. SICOTTE

JOHN F SICOTTE BEEHLER, PAVITT, SIEGEMUND, ET AL1100 EQUITABLE PLZ3435 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90010-1978

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036BANKING SERVICESABANDONEDFeb 4, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 1987ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance