Drawing for THE HEAVENLY BAKERY

USPTO serial 73470072

THE HEAVENLY BAKERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, RON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HEAVENLY BAKERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD S. TEMKO

TEMKO & TEMKO19 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BAKED GOODSABANDONEDAug 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 30, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 5, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 1985EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 25, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 31, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 2, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 1982EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance